Showing posts with label corporations. Show all posts
Showing posts with label corporations. Show all posts

29 June 2019

Brother Rabbit Lifestyle Origins: Part 1 -The Great Exhibition


In this series, a discussion of what is meant by the Brother Rabbit Lifestyle, we will discuss the origins of our influences. The first of these is most foremostly the Arts & Crafts Movement, and the impetus for this great worldwide movement was The Great Exhibition of 1851.

This influence upon the founders of the Arts & Crafts Movement may best be called a negative impetus. How not to be, if you will; a spur to a happier vision of life. There are those enough who found the Industrial Revolution a marvel and steam and coal mechanisation a great Wonder of the World. But for the working man, it was – in the view of the founders of the Arts & Crafts – the death knell of a happy life being in control of one's daily work in one's own environs, the fulfilment of William Blake's vision of 'dark Satanic mills', and of Mary Shelley and the Romantics' fear of industrialisation upon the character of man, who would seek to place himself above all of nature, controlling every thing and everyone, dehumanising the working man. To quote Denise Willard, 'Before industrialization, people worked on the land. People experienced a connection with nature. However, with the rise of industrialization, people worked less with the land and more with machines and in factories. It did not require skilled workers. All this new technology required was faceless workers to perform simple tasks, and with this came a fear of being swallowed up, or forgotten in the glory of innovation.' So, this tension of cross-purposes was the backdrop against which the Great Exhibition was born.

Being impressed with the French industrial exhibition two years earlier, in 1846 Henry Cole and Prince Albert, consort of Queen Victoria, teamed up to create an international exhibition in Britain. The Duke of Wellington was a proponent of having the Exhibition in Hyde Park, and the architectural firm of Fox and Henderson changed their design of an iron and glass conservatory style building (later known as The Crystal Palace) to accommodate the elm trees in the park, buiulding around them and incorporating them into the building. The Crystal Palace was constructed from prefabricated and interchangeable parts made of the most modern materials, iron and glass. The Exhibition, which ran from May through October, 1851, showcased British design in every area of manufacture, and was deliberately filled with products of great size and ingenuity to shock and awe – huge blocks of coal, the largest steam locomotives, hydraulic presses and steam-hammers, a scale model of the Liverpool docks with 1,600 miniature ships in full rigging; sewing machines, ice-making machines, cigarette-rolling machines, machines to mint medals and machines to fold envelopes were included amonst the pottery, porcelain, ironwork, furniture, perfumes, pianos, firearms, fabrics, and two houses.

Not everyone was a fan of the wonders of modernity. One of the six millions attending, a teenaged William Morris – founder of the English Arts & Crafts Movement - attending with his parents, refused to go inside, being certain that he would loathe it. Being persuaded or forced to go inside, the 17 year old pronounced it all ‘wonderfully ugly’and reportedly was so disturbed by the garishness of modern design and decoration that he fled the building to be sick in the bushes. Similarly, John Ruskin – art critic and patron, draughtsman, watercolourist and guiding light of the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood and Arts & Crafts Movement - concluded that ‘if any lesson is to be drawn from the Great Exhibition’ it was that ‘design in the hands of a machine-minded money-seeking generation tends to take a downward curve’.

Thus was born the Arts & Crafts. According to the V&A, the The Arts and Crafts movement in Britain was born out of an increasing understanding that society needed to adopt a different set of priorities in relation to the manufacture of objects. Its leaders wanted to develop products that not only had more integrity but which were also made in a less dehumanising way.

Structured more by a set of ideals than a prescriptive style, the Movement took its name from the Arts and Crafts Exhibition Society, a group founded in London in 1887 that had as its first president the artist and book illustrator Walter Crane. The Society's chief aim was to assert a new public relevance for the work of decorative artists and decorative art. It is this primacy of the decorative arts, and of Arts and Crafts ideals that is the basis of our work and the Brother Rabbit Lifestyle.

04 December 2014

The Arts and Crafts Ethic as a Template for the Future

We are embarking on a long-term project which significantly promotes the Arts and Crafts.

This project will delineate the origins of the ethic of the Arts and Crafts Movement of the late 19th and early 20th Centuries in America, the British Isles and selected countries in Europe. It will explicate the manner in which the ethic was lived by members of the movement, famous and obscure. It will trace the revivals of this ethic into modern times, including the Wandervogel in pre-World War II Germany and the Back to Nature movement of the 1970s. It will show the strong underpinning of this Movement in various contemporary social and artistic  movements across the world.
For the contemporary research, the project will include a website featuring surveys, a blog, and forum for discussion in community.

The result will be a published book on the findings, inspiring and leading people into a new, sane, sustainable future.

09 February 2011

Radical Homemakers: Reclaiming Domesticity from a Consumer Culture

Rush out NOW and read this book.
EVERYTHING that Shannon advocates for in Radical Homemakers is what I've been about since I was 14 years old. Everything. It is downright amusing that a radical sociology book about taking back the home can make me CRY. But it does.

I feel validated for everything I have ever believed and striven for. And she describes the three stages of the process, and I can agree with her conclusion that if one spends too long in Step Two that one becomes subject to the kind of depression and futility that Betty Friedan wrote so passionately against.

She also argues against the wife-mother as chauffeur car culture that arose after the Second World War - which was totally foisted on us by the corporations. We are not here to drive our children from this and that or to buy this or that for the husband and 'the house'! That is not our role in life! But we have been pressurised into that role. Unless we rebel...

=) Here's to rebellion! and making a real home.

Viz:
Renouncing: increasingly aware of the illusory happiness of a consumer society. Recognise and question the compulsion to purchase goods and services that they feel they could provide for themselves 'if only...'

Reclaiming: Recovering many skills that enable one to build a life without a conventional income. This phase can take a few years or a lifetime and will perpetually be returned to as one builds ever more skills. If dwelt only in this phase for too long begin to manifest symptoms of Friedan's housewife's syndrome - 'what's all this for?'

Rebuilding: Take on genuine creative challenges, engagement with community, make significant contributions toward rebuilding a new society that reflects one's vision of a better world, through artwork, writing, farming, fine craftwork, social reform, activism, teaching, or a small business.

'The choice to become homemakers is not an act of submission or family servitude. It is an act of social transformation.... it is time we come to think of our hoes as living systems. Like sourdough starter, the home's survival requires constant attention. A true home pulses with nonhuman life - vegetable patches, yeast, backyard hens, blueberry bushes, culturing yoghurt, fermenting wine and sauerkraut, brewing beer, milk goats, cats, dogs, houseplants, kids' science projects, pet snakes and strawberry patches...'