25 July 2007

Bathing Costume

Over on a plain dress group I am a member of, there is a discussion of the latest in muslim swimwear - the burquini. It amounts to a tunic with or without sleeves, with or without long-sleeved undershirt, and leggings.

I hate leggings. Having spent years in tights as a dancer, I have had quite enough of showing off my legs. So I was wondering how the tunic with sleeves affair would look with loose knee-length drawers... and realised (here we go again!) that it was a bathing costume from the 1910s. Must have been a past life. In any event, this is more or less what I have in mind:



I do have a wonderful 1930s bathing suit, which to modern eyes is very modest... but it has big pink and brown flowers on it - on a green background - and is much too uncovered for my current needs. So here we go, backward to that incredibly amazing summer of 1914, when the weather in Europe was perfect, even in Dublin. Until the guns of August.

She is watching by the poplars,
Colinette with the sea-blue eyes,
She is watching and longing and waiting,
Where the long white roadway lies.
And a song stirs in the silence,
As the wind in the boughs above,
She listens and starts and trembles,
'Tis the first little song of love:

Roses are shining in Picardy,
In the hush of the silver dew,
Roses are flow'ring in Picardy,
But there's never a rose like you!
And the roses will die with the summertime,
And our roads may be far apart,
But there's one rose that dies Not in Picardy!
'Tis the rose that I keep in my heart!

Another gown and nostalgia

I forgot this one yesterday. Of the whole period, I have to say that the late 1780s and 90s and this are my favourite styles. I have made the Regency gown in many incarnations for others, for wedding gowns, dressing gowns, First Communion dress (my Bridgie) - for myself it did its turn in the maternity and nursing period. I like the neat lines of it, the grace.



Of other periods, I do like 1900 through the late 1930s, but there are styles I don't feel that I can wear anymore without looking like mutton dressed as lamb, and much of that in the 1910s is among them, alas. It is a very girlish manner of dress. Some of the tubular 20s dresses I must avoid also, as I just look boxy, but I'm right on with the 30s. Much of my work wardrobe still is chic 20s, 30s and early 40s - when not Edwardian.

Whenever I am called upon to play Mother of the Bride (or Groom) I have a pattern from the early 30s that I will use, with an interesting cut, jewel neck, asymetrical drapery across the bodice - very smart. But I refuse to wear pastel! I adored the Queen Mum, but that is not my look - even though by then my hair will probably be much lighter than this present ginger-fade-to-blonde. No, it will be jewel tones - I can make an exception for my kids' weddings - and in the glam retro style I used to wear. I will wear a hat. My whole life I have always been the only woman at weddings and funerals in a hat.

... Once, during the Christmas season, I was walking into a shop wearing a 1930s polka-dot dress (purple), my green velveteen hat, swish overcoat and gloves, and seamed stockings that day, and I heard the guy behind me whisper to his wife 'she does Swing Dancing...' I did, but it was cute to hear. At this time there were several of us retros in the Financial District, including a man in my office building who always wore the scrummiest suits - and a hat any time he was outdoors. He wasn't especially handsome, but oh my, did he have dash and style!

24 July 2007

designs

Following are the designs I made for 'day wear at home' - except that the first one here following is intended as a Sunday dress. It is based on a mourning gown from 1768, and is a 'sacque-backed gown'



To go with it, there is a cape or tippet, based on that worn by Elizabeth Ann Bayley Seton, St Elizabeth Seton, more on whom below:



I'm leaving the options open on the next one about the waist - a slightly higher waist was certainly period, and is in any case flattering to most women. having a gathered overlay is both for modesty and to get that period 'shepherdess' look without hanging out all over.



For the longest while I thought the late 1820s-30s look was odd, dowdy, neither fish nor fowl nor good red herring. Then I saw some Aesthetic Dress gowns and changed my mind. My new 'Christmas dress' is basically in this mode. I want more!



Now, I am under certain constraints in matters of dress, both vowed and by choice. In the Third Order, we are adjured to dress plainly in inexpensive stuffs, avoiding anything that is ostentatious, vain or costly. This, to my mind, naturally includes modesty, but does not actually fall under the requirements of dress in Canon Law (a neckline no more than two or three finger-breadths beneath the collarbone, elbow-length sleeves, dresses at least 8 inches below the knee.) Modest is pretty easy for me; plain is not. Like Hester Prynne, I have a 'rich Oriental fancy', and my favourite colours are scarlet and forest green. Not very modest or plain! When I became a Franciscan I limited myself to brown, charcoal grey, black, and dark green (alas not my favourite but olive.) Because I am a penitent, it feels fitting. But it is so very hard! Daily, I offer it up to God, as I look with envy others' embroidery, lace, or clever knitting.

As for Mother Seton, she is my patron saint, rather than someone more obvious like Clare or Brigid, because she was born in 1774, was a convert (as was I as a teenager) and she was beatified on the day I was born. Of the cape: when she was widowed in Italy, the Fillicis - her beloved William's friends - gave her Italian widow's garb: her little bonnet, the cape and a long-sleeved gown. This was something for the former Miss Bayley of New York! At any rate, Mother was religious anyway and was in Italy very drawn to Catholicism. When she returned to NY, she converted from the Episcopal Church, founded an Order (of necessity - she was desperately poor and needed to teach) and died quite young. Little was I to know as a young girl how close Mother's life would be to my own, in terms of grief. But I still hear her whispering to me, I still draw comfort from her person. So the little cape is a tribute to her.

The Influence of Literature, and other Oddments



Per blessed Susanna’s request, shortly I shall be posting some renderings of day gowns – having capitulated to my fancies and completely gone off modern dress. This is not a new experience; it has been with me since I was a small child, as my sainted mother could attest.

When I was in high school we had copies of Norah Waugh’s ‘The Cut of Women’s Clothes’ and I pored over it, making tracings, patterns, and my own designs, mostly from the 1630s-1840. It was the inner portions of garments which fascinated me (and continues to do)- tapes, hooks, manner of linings, and minute stitches. I was in heaven. I annoyed my Home Economics teacher by making a shift and mid-18thC day gown, when everyone else were making tops and trousers. She didn’t know what to make of me, and couldn’t critique what I was making because she knew nothing about it, so I failed the course!

When I was in college, we had all of Janet Arnold’s ‘Patterns of Fashion’, which I likewise devoured. I became quite a dab hand at pattern draughting, of necessity, if one can call an obsession with pre-Civil War garments a necessity. I annoyed my cohorts in the Costume Department of our theatre with my tiny machine stitches (20-30 per inch) – but it was the only way I could replicate the fine stitching of the past – and the requisite ‘bought items’ 8-10 stitches per inch I thought hopelessly vulgar and coarse.

I was enthralled with PBS, which in those days actually presented good quality programmes – from The Six Wives of Henry the VIII to The Mill on the Floss (and yes, Upstairs Downstairs) I was enchanted. Being a voracious reader, I had already run through all of the Brontes (including Patrick’s ‘lost novel’), Jane Austen, George Elliot, Elizabeth Gaskell, Swift, Sterne, Hawthorne and Cooper. And through all, the clothing fascinated me. I wanted to wear it, because I felt ‘at home’ therein – in dress or undress clothes.

Withal, it is no wonder that I ended up as a Person of the Past at Colonial Williamsburg and made many of my own pieces (we were allowed to do, but they had to be approved.) It had been my dream to work there since I was a child – in the heyday of ‘hostesses’ – what a vulgar come-down since! – but my dear Lady Washington said then and since that it was a good thing I never was shunted away in the Costume Design Centre, for I would have been frustrated, and wasted.

I saw what she meant, for I did have my run-ins with them – over a dark green petticoat with a fine flowered muslin gown, over the binding of a 1780 pair of stays (both of which I had the documentation for), and, for my part, over the ‘coarse and vulgar’ stuffs used for caps. Of the latter, in period paintings, one sees caps gossamer and exquisite – why could they not be made thus? ‘Not durable’ I was told; ‘too difficult’ I was told. But I wanted what I wanted – the beautifully made pieces my fancy conjured from the pages of period literature, reinforced by extant examples of period garments.

Was I insane? Possibly. But if so, I was in good company, as the commitment to authenticity was about to become a huge issue in the insular world of re-enactment. Such attention to authenticity is now a given, and farby ‘impressions’ are not widely tolerated, except as Hallowe’en costumes. We have come a long way. But not far enough, to my taste. As a friend of mine at Williamsburg (the Rev, Mr. Henley) once said ‘every year our modern life grows farther from the everyday life of the 18th century, and what we represent becomes ever-increasingly incomprehensible to visitors.’ It is true of any period prior to the supersonic age.

What I find myself wanting, in the midst of cell phones and computers, iPhones, email, and telemarketers, is to switch off, live simply, write letters, bake bread, boil water, hang the washing on the line. John Donne once wrote complaining of the noise of a fly in the room in which he was writing. S’truth! Would we even notice now? I want life not to fly by in ‘information age’ nanobites. I want peace and quiet and the pleasure of an hour’s stitching, of reading an old book, of actually waiting 6 hours to have bread from wild yeast.

Time wastes too fast: every letter I trace tells me with what rapidity Life follows my pen; the days and hours of it, more precious, my dear Jenny! than the rubies about thy neck, are flying over our heads like light clouds of a windy day, never to return more – everything presses on – whilst thou art twisting that lock, – see! it grows grey; and every time I kiss thy hand to bid adieu, and every absence which follows it, are preludes to that eternal separation which we are shortly to make.
-Lawrence Sterne, Tristram Shandy

11 July 2007

Domestic Life (Works in Progress)

In the wake of having sorted out the ‘summer clothing ration’ – the several items of work clothes I got the stuff for recently – it became time to make lists, begin new projects, and finish old ones.

Some of the old projects are:
-an Aesthetic dress in a yallery green leaf print, which I can wear at Christmas as a ‘dress gown’ (I never wear prints any more.)
-a stumpwork rendition of The Scarlet Letter (my lifelong obsession.)
-frame a repro Williamsburg sampler from the 1760s
-a pair of 1780s maternity stays (to go with a gown for a teaching project)
- a canvas chair cover for my friend Lady Washington (motifs only)

Those in progress are:
-ruching for a Swiss dirndl
-an altar cloth for our chapel at work

To be made up:
- a 17th C. Dutch wedding sampler for my friend’s 20th anniversary (her husband is Dutch)
- a queen stitch pinball for my friend Lady Washington (I must be insane)
- an Irish stitch pocketbook, ditto.

Then there is a new ‘Grand Coiffe’ in black batiste, to wear to Mass so people will not think I am a nun. I was searching about madly for an acceptable alternative to my plain black gauze half-circle veil, which to me was as Franciscan and un-nunlike as could be.

I have tried so hard to keep away from lace mantillas, ‘chapel veils’ (as being too much like an 18th C. pinner), and in general anything that savoured of the 18th C, precisely because I have done so much living history in the period and I didn’t want people to think I was obsessed; as those re-enactors who cannot readjust to the modern world, who haven’t a ‘real life’. And yet, one day, this solution in the form of the old coif appeared as a bolt from the blue, though I had seen it many times. It just felt ‘right’. I chose black because it is both as far from the re-enactor or Anabaptist as I could make, and because I am not twelve years old – which is my argument against white or cream Mass coverings in general.

Since deciding on this solution, my fancy has been devising all manner of day dresses in the 1780-1830 period – familiar and beloved. Necessary? Most certainly not. I have kept my made items to 1900-1948, which until recently was at least in the right century. Nevertheless, my heart is drawn to more remote periods – the 17th and early 18th centuries in specific. But even I recognise that any such garb, even as ‘undress’ wear would be way over the top.

When I worked at Williamsburg, Tasha Tudor was a frequent visitor and an especial friend of my dear Mr. Jefferson; I envied Miss Tudor’s being able to wear exactly what she pleases, which as everyone knows is not modern.

When I am an old woman I shall wear caracoes and round gowns; but for now I will content me with embroidery.